A recurrent complaint in some quarters is that mobile phone subsidies, tied to service contracts that recoup the cost of the subsidies, inhibits consumer freedom to change service providers, and there is some logic to the thinking.
But it also is true that without such device subsidies, consumer adoption of the latest devices, and therefore the pace of innovation in the mobile apps space, would be less.
One clear example are buy rates for Android and Apple iPhone devices in countries where users generally buy subsidized devices, compared to markets where users generally pay the full retail price of handsets.
As this chart from the Wall Street Journal illustrates, subsidies have a big and positive impact on consumer willingness to buy and use either Android smart phones or Apple iPhone devices.
Monday, February 27, 2012
Device Subsidies Do Matter
Gary Kim has been a communications industry analyst and journalist for more than 30 years, covering the business impact of technology. These days he especially studies changing business models and strategies.He speaks frequently at conferences and spends quite a lot of time organizing conferences and content as well.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"Tokens" are the New "FLOPS," "MIPS" or "Gbps"
Modern computing has some virtually-universal reference metrics. For Gemini 1.5 and other large language models, tokens are a basic measure...
-
We have all repeatedly seen comparisons of equity value of hyperscale app providers compared to the value of connectivity providers, which s...
-
It really is surprising how often a Pareto distribution--the “80/20 rule--appears in business life, or in life, generally. Basically, the...
-
Who gets to use spectrum, and concerns about interference from other users, now appears to be an issue for Google’s Project Loon in India. ...
No comments:
Post a Comment